Recently updated on August 5th, 2024 at 10:58 pm
Environmentalists in Europe and beyond cheered as Germany’s last three nuclear power plants went offline over the weekend, a controversial move the country’s environmental minister hailed as the start of “a new era of energy production.”
The Associated Press reports the Emsland, Neckarwestheim II, and Isar II nuclear plants were shut down shortly before midnight Saturday after decades of protests and pressure by anti-nuclear campaigners.
“Millions of people worked towards this day for years,” Greenpeace Germany managing director Roland Hipp wrote in an opinion piece published Sunday by Common Dreams. “People who protested against reprocessing plants, nuclear waste transport, unsafe nuclear waste storage facilities, and the construction of new nuclear power plants. Those decades of resistance were worth it.”
“The German nuclear phaseout is a victory of reason over the lust for profit; over powerful corporations and their client politicians,” Hipp added. “It is a people-powered success against all the odds.”
Germany’s nuclear shutdown—which was originally scheduled for completion by the end of 2022—was postponed as part of a compromise by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, a member of the Social Democratic Party, due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and subsequent fuel shortages.
The phaseout—a key component of Germany’s plan to produce 80% of the country’s power from renewable sources by the end of the decade—is highly controversial, as numerous experts including former NASA climate scientist James Hansen urged Scholz to keep the reactors online.
Opponents of the phaseout argued that Germany’s plan to replace the roughly 6% of electricity generated by the three shuttered nuclear plants with renewables, gas, and coal—the latter of which fuels more than 30% of the country’s power—poses a greater climate risk than keeping the reactors in operation.
“Germany recognizes that renewables are cheaper, faster, and safer than nuclear power and come without a lethal waste legacy.”
However, German Environment Minister Steffi Lemke, a member of Alliance 90/The Greens, argued that “the risks of nuclear power are ultimately unmanageable.”
Last week, Lemke visited Fukushima, Japan, site of the March 2011 nuclear disaster—the worst since the Chernobyl meltdown in Ukraine in 1986, when the country was part of the Soviet Union.
Juergen Trittin, parliamentary leader of Alliance 90/The Greens, said that “we are putting an end to a dangerous, unsustainable, and costly technology.”
Linda Pentz Gunter, founder of the advocacy group Beyond Nuclear, said in a statement that “the renewable energy revolution needed to save us from the worst of the climate crisis is a matter of political will, not technical know-how, and Germany’s weekend shutdown of its last three nuclear reactors marks a strong step in that direction.”
“The nuclear phaseout opened the way for renewable energy growth in Germany,” she added. “Germany recognizes that renewables are cheaper, faster, and safer than nuclear power and come without a lethal waste legacy. The United States would do well to follow this example, rather than continue to fund nuclear power, the slowest, and most expensive of all energy choices.”
Germany’s neighbors remain heavily dependent upon nuclear power. France derives about 70% of its electricity from 56 nuclear power plants, while such facilities provide Switzerland and Belgium with between 30% and 40% of their electric power.
During a Group of Seven meeting that included Germany over the weekend, Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States announced a new nuclear power alliance and G7 ministers put out a statement that says “those countries that opt to use nuclear energy recognize its potential to provide affordable low-carbon energy that can reduce dependence on fossil fuels, to address the climate crisis, and to ensure global energy security as a source of baseload energy and grid flexibility.”
